top of page
THE NUMBERS BEHIND THE STORIES

Data can help identify patterns.

Across different systems, current data reveals different parts of the problem — from disproportionate outcomes to what is identified or recognised, recorded, measured and supported.

EMPLOYMENT

TWICE AS LIKELY

Autistic graduates are twice as likely to be unemployed 15 months after graduation as non-disabled graduates.

​

Source

Buckland Review of Autism Employment

(2024)

SOCIAL CARE

52%

of those identified by social workers with a learning disability were not recorded as disabled in the Children in Need census.

Source

Department for Education

(2026)

JUSTICE

OVER-REPRESENTED

Neurodivergent children are over-represented in the youth justice system.

​

​

 

Source

Youth Justice

Board

(2024)

LOCAL AUTHORITIES

98%

of SEND tribunal decisions were found wholly or partly in favour of parents and young people.

 

 

Source

Ministry of Justice

​

(2022/23)​

EDUCATION

4 1/2 times

Pupils with identified SEND are 4½ times more likely to be suspended than the other children.​​​​​

 

Source

House of Commons

Library ​

​

(2025)

HEALTHCARE

OVER 4 YEARS WAIT

23% of children diagnosed with

ADHD waited over four years from referral to diagnosis.

 

 

Source

Children's Commissioner

(2024)

What remains inadequately measured is the full scale of these disparities across the neurodivergent population — and the extent to which misunderstanding, exclusion or discrimination contribute to them

LOOKING BEYOND THE NUMBERS

Statistics can reveal an outcome — but not always its scale or its cause.

The following sections explore what research tells us, what it doesn't tell us, and the important evidence that remains missing.

EMPLOYMENT

Research shows

Available data shows very low employment among working-age autistic disabled people.

What's not captured

Employment outcomes across the whole autistic population compared directly with the non-autistic population.

What's not questioned

To what extent do recruitment practices, workplace expectations and systemic barriers create the disparity?

SOCIAL CARE

Research shows

Children with identified SEND

are disproportionately represented within the care system.

​

What's not measured

The consequence of unmet SEND needs, delayed support or inadequate provision contribute to children entering or remaining in care.

What's not questioned

How often does failure to support a

child's needs become treated as a

family or social-care problem?

 

JUSTICE

Research shows

People with ADHD are consistently disproportionately represented within

the justice system

What's not measured

How many people entering the justice system have unidentified or unsupported neurodivergent needs.

What's not questioned

To what extent do unmet needs, exclusion and systemic barriers contribute to involvement with the justice system?

HEALTHCARE

Research shows

Many children experience prolonged waits before receiving assessment or diagnosis.

What's not measured

The cumulative educational, emotional and family impact of years spent waiting for identification and support.

What's not questioned

What harm is created while waiting and what could have been prevented by earlier recognition and support?

EDUCATION

Research shows

Pupils with identified SEND

experience significantly higher rates

of suspension than their peers.

What's not measured

The extent of unmet needs, inappropriate support and behaviour policies contributing to suspensions and other poor outcomes.

What's not questioned

How often is neurodivergent distress or difference treated as behaviour to managed rather than a need to be understood?

LOCAL AUTHORITIES

Research shows

Most SEND tribunal decisions are found wholly or partly in favour of parents and young people.

What's not measured

How many families cannot appeal, abandon appeals or accept decisions they believe are wrong.

What's not questioned

Why are Local Authority decisions commonly overturned once in the tribunal process and why is this not investigated?

The key question remains unanswered:

If legal protections exist, why do people so commonly and consistently fail to experience those protections in practice?

The absence of evidence should not be mistaken for the absence of a problem.

Sometimes it simply reflects the fact that the question has not yet been asked.

BRIDGING THE EVIDENCE GAP

Requires thinking differently:

FOR EVERY NEUROTYPE

Looking beyond individual diagnoses

to recognise neurodivergence as a connected community with shared experiences, overlapping traits and common barriers. Together, this

broader perspective helps reveal the systemic issues that unite them.

WHERE EVERY VOICE COUNTS

Anonymous submissions allow students, parents, professionals, employees, allies and the wider community to share honest lived experiences without fear of judgement or consequence. Every perspective helps build a fuller understanding of SENDism.

EVERY EXPERIENCE IS EVIDENCE

By collecting lived experiences from the neurodivergent community in one place, patterns begin to emerge that individual stories and condition-specific research cannot easily reveal alone, providing the evidence needed to better understand and challenge SENDism across society

Individual stories raise awareness, but when viewed as a collective from an entire community, these experiences reveal systemic patterns.

bottom of page